View Single Post
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-03-2011, 23:44
Roboman01 Roboman01 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Bradley Matheus
FRC #0687 (Nerd Herd)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 28
Roboman01 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Solution: Variable position of cylinder in compliance with <R74>

We ended up keeping the system as a "Plan C," since the BaneBots motor on the shoulder of our arm burnt up the night before shipping, and we weren't sure if we could get the new gearbox to work at the San Diego regional. However, in testing, we did find that we needed "purge valves" on each line to the cylinder, since we would be trapping atmospheric pressure in the cylinder, preventing movement. Since it wasn't technically pressurized, it was still a legal setup. We haven't actually implemented the system in a competition. Our motor/gearbox setup has worked through two competitions, so far (San Diego and LA), so we haven't seen a need to change it out, despite the fact that the pneumatic system would be lighter and easier to control. However, this was an interesting learning experience, and I hope to implement something to this effect in next year's competition.

EDIT: I created a PDF documenting the process of designing our system. I thought you guys might find it interesting.

Last edited by Roboman01 : 26-03-2011 at 02:19. Reason: Added PDF