View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2011, 13:11
Jim Zondag's Avatar
Jim Zondag Jim Zondag is offline
Team Leader
FRC #0033 (Killer Bees)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Auburn Hills
Posts: 317
Jim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tetrix Switch not allowed?

Fewer contstraints = more solutions
If FIRST wants us to innovate, there should be as few design constraints as possible. There are really only 3 reasons there should ever be design constraints in the FRC.
1. Safety
2. Fairness / Unfair Competitive Advantage
3. Robot Control in the competition setting.
If something does not fall into one of these 3 categories, it should not be a design constraint. The light switch rule is a clear case of needess pettiness in the rules encoding for no obvious reason. The vendor of a component should NEVER be a design constraint unless the functionality of the component specifically addresses one of the 3 catagories above.
__________________
"To learn what is possible, we must attempt the impossible." Arthur C. Clarke