View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2011, 22:18
clayman's Avatar
clayman clayman is offline
Registered User
AKA: Clayton
FRC #3175 (Knight Vision)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dearborn Heights, MI
Posts: 34
clayman is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Pneumatic engine discussion continuation

Out of curiosity, are we still trying to make this feasible? I do like the concept of spring returns, but the only advantage I see in them would be not having to power them back - which is canceled out, of course, by the necessity of pairing them with more pistons (I checked, 15 ibs is about the max force you can get for a spring return, and that's with a 2" bore - pretty sluggish). Swapping around bore and stroke may give more power for the same air volume, but I'd begin to worry about the chances of such a smaller shaft offset just causing the engine to lock up (not to mention that reducing the torque arm defeats the purpose of increasing the bore).
Reply With Quote