View Single Post
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2011, 22:48
Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Betts Mike Betts is offline
Electrical Engineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Homosassa, FL
Posts: 1,442
Mike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Solution: Variable position of cylinder in compliance with <R74>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboman01 View Post
...Also, since the "check valves" that I'm using are technically flow-control valves, they are legal, as I stated previously.
I know what you have stated and I'm not going to argue with you as it seems that you have made up your mind.

However, for the sake of other readers, the GDC has stated that if a component contains a check valve, it is illegal.

I do not need to like their ruling and I will not defend it... However, if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck...

JMHO,

Mike
__________________
Mike Betts

Alumnus, Team 3518, Panthrobots, 2011
Alumnus, Team 177, Bobcat Robotics, 1995 - 2010
LRI, Connecticut Regional, 2007-2010
LRI, WPI Regional, 2009 - 2010
RI, South Florida Regional, 2012 - 2013

As easy as 355/113...