|
Re: Are all girl FIRST team counterproductive to the philosophy of FIRST?
With regard to the original question, "allowed" implies a regulatory solution. I think there's a broader question: should gender-specific teams be encouraged within FIRST?
The regulatory angle is one way to discourage them (or eliminate them entirely), but it shouldn't be the only thing we consider.
From a formal point of view, I'd need strong evidence that they were almost always a bad thing to ban them, but would be satisfied with moderate evidence that they were usually bad as a reason for discouraging them, and would interpret ambiguous evidence as a reason for not actively encouraging them. Those represent several degrees of "no", but I think they better express the continuum of options.
|