View Single Post
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2011, 23:18
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,190
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Solution: Variable position of cylinder in compliance with <R74>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboman01 View Post
Okay, I see what you're saying. Still, a valve that applies pressure to both ports in the middle position should only allow for three positions, unless you use an electronic regulator on one side. If you use an electronic regulator, you might as well just use the system described in the initial post - it will save weight and reduce complexity.
There are three states, not three positions: extending, retracting, and stopped. [there are 5 states if you include full extension and complete retraction]
__________________