Thread: Who thinks fixed alliances would be interesting?
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2011, 08:48
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Who thinks fixed alliances would be interesting?
You are entitled to your own opinion, but I think this would be really unfair and it would take the fun out of the competition.

Playing with different teams every match and working together with them is half the fun. Teams that play well earn the right to play on a good alliance. If you got stuck with a bad team, the entire competition would be ruined. I wouldn't want to pay $4000 for a regional and get stuck playing with a team that couldn't do anything.

Working together with the same alliances would be interesting for strategy, but not interesting enough to be worth it, given the aforementioned problems.

~ Steven
Reply With Quote