View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2011, 10:02
scottydoh scottydoh is offline
CAD, Mechanical, Alumni, Mentor
AKA: Scott
FRC #0810 (Mechanical Bulls)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Smithtown, Long Island, NY
Posts: 236
scottydoh is a name known to allscottydoh is a name known to allscottydoh is a name known to allscottydoh is a name known to allscottydoh is a name known to allscottydoh is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to scottydoh Send a message via Yahoo to scottydoh
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy View Post
It gives absolutely zero competitive advantage, and I don't understand why we're not allowed to use it, since its equally safe.
Quote:
<R69> Compressed air for the pneumatic system on the ROBOT must be provided by one and only one compressor. This compressor may be either the compressor from the KOP, or an equivalent compressor that does not exceed any of the KOP compressor performance specifications (specifically: nominal 12v, 1.03 cfm flow rate, 120psi maximum working pressure). Compressed air shall not come from any other source. Off-board compressors must be controlled and powered by the ROBOT.
This is why. The inspection checklist also specifically says the off board compressor MUST be powered by the ROBOT control system.

Are there other safe way to pressurize the system? Yes. But having everything controlled by the robot control system makes things go much smoother for both team and inspectors.
__________________
www.smithtownrobotics.com
Robot Inspector (SBPLI 2011)
2011 Johnson & Johnson Gracious Professionalism (NYC) Judges Award (SBPLI)
2009 Xerox Creativity (SBPLI)
Mechanical Bulls; Student Leader 2006-2008, Mentor 2009-Present
New York Institute of Technology - Architecture '13 | Design Portfolio:www.coroflot.com/sdifiore