|
Re: The correct attitude in FIRST
Pardon the fragmented nature of this reply. I lack the time this morning to make it more succinct.
One can easily believe in the stated goals of FIRST without approving of every action taken by FIRST HQ.
FIRST is us. If we don't like what FIRST is doing, it's up to us to do something different.
There's a difference between badmouthing and criticism.
If he's "against FIRST", what is he for instead?
|