|
Re: Should this have been allowed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghandler94
I talked to a judge in D.C. about this. It is not illegal UNLESS it disobeys the rule of entanglement. So, essentially, unless the tube gets stuck on the robot, it is LEGAL.
|
I'm doubting that entanglement reasoning. That should only apply to a robot and robot actions. The point there is to keep robots from getting entangled with each other. I know it doesn't apply this year, but in 2007 it was perfectly legal to throw tubes on robots with the expectation they'd get caught. The gdc expected teams to design robots that weren't vulnerable to this.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.
Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
|