View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-04-2011, 15:10
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,190
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jaguar VS Victor

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuggetsyl View Post
I am totally pro victor.
They weight less
They have smaller foot print
And oh yea you don't see thread after thread on them burning out.
I really like the fact first offers both for us to use. You can never go wrong with choice.
No, they don't chronically burn up, but I have seen a picture of a bunch of partially dissolved victors, I think it was due to loctite.

Victors, in my opinion, are the way to go if you want reliability and aren't to sure about CAN (I'm sure there is some special case in which a jaguar in pwm mode would have some advantages over a victor, ignoring the limit switch feature which is currently off-limits [pardon the pun] to pwm users) I also like the smaller size of the victors. Jaguars operating with can, on the other hand, can really streamline automation.
__________________

Last edited by PAR_WIG1350 : 26-04-2011 at 15:14.