View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-05-2011, 13:14
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is online now
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,829
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Losing on Purpose to Gain Advantage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leav View Post
My simple answer to this complicated question: if you were on Team C, how would you feel about Team B throwing the match?
I think this is the bottom line. If team B could throw the match to improve their overall chances of success (lose the battle to win the war, shall we say) without harming or betraying the trust of another team, then I would be willing to accept that this is a legitimate strategy.

The catch is that the premise of the qualifying rounds is that the teams with which you have been randomly allied will work with you in order to win the match.

The issue here is not whether "throwing the match" is right or wrong, but whether betraying your alliance partners is right or wrong. Kind of makes it a simple choice, doesn't it?

Jason
Reply With Quote