|
Re: Losing on Purpose to Gain Advantage
I'd like to see opinions on a slight alteration of the original scenario:
Scenario:
Current Rankings:
1. Team A (Undefeated)
2. Team C (Undefeated)
...
20. Team B
Team A is the "best" robot in the division.
Team B is the 2nd best robot in the division.
Team C is the 3rd best robot in the division.
Match:
Team B & X & Y vs. A & U & V in the last match of the day.
X & Y are decent robots, but not in the top 12. U & V are the "worst" robots in the division.
If Team B wins that last match, then Team C gets the Top-Seed, will then pick team A and lead to a division victory for them.
If Team A wins the last match, they get Top-Seed, will then pick Team B, leading to a division victory for both of them.
The question:
Is it appropriate for Team B to not play at their full potential, knowing that it will greatly improve their chances of winning in the end? Assume that X & Y don't mind showcasing their ability to play 2 v 3.
|