View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2011, 16:46
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Swerve Drive Modules

It's going to be tough to get the bearing holes aligned based on the tolerances on the sheet-metal bends. This will be even tougher because your design doesn't have a flat surface parallel to the bend line that the brake operator can use as a back-stop.

Correct bevel-gear alignment is VERY important in a design like this, especially if you're using a "small" bevel gear. My advice would be to use the one Aren suggested (good size for this application).

You should consider making your bottom wheel-axle into a structural axle (make it into a standoff with both ends tapped, or (148's favorite trick) make it 1/2" OD tube with a 1/4" ID, then run a 1/4" bolt through it. Making the axle a structural member in this way will GREATLY stiffen up your module. Right now I'd be concerned that the forces on the module will "unbend" the sheetmetal -- you should do something to turn the module into a box structure.

Ohh -- I almost forgot: don't do a swerve drive. The cost is greater than the benefit in almost ALL situations for almost ALL teams.

-John
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST