Quote:
Originally Posted by FRC4ME
I'm a little concerned that the best you can say about FIRST is that they "aren't totally diabolical." I honestly believe FIRST's goals are pure and not corrupt. Are you implying that this isn't the case?
|
It is a simple anecdote that could be used to address cynicism surrounding FIRST regarding some of their decisions, not their goals. If we don't understand some of the decisions FIRST makes, and then they keep making mistakes or consistently disagreeing with us (small issues most of the time) without any sort of transparency, are we wrong to question their motives? Or should we always presume the motives behind the decisions are 'pure'? While I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt, emerging patterns are very difficult to ignore.