View Single Post
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2011, 09:03
O'Sancheski O'Sancheski is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 675
O'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond reputeO'Sancheski has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawiian Cadder View Post
yes, but i knew Galileo. would still win. in past years the championships winner was pre-determined, but barring major failure, i didn't think anyone had much of a chance against the alliance that still won.
I can see what you are saying. At the start of championships, everyone knew that Galileo was the field with the best robots. But the other fields had equally as good of robots. You can't just jump to a conclusion based on who is on which field. I know there is the "Curie Curse" but everyone thought that 469 and 1114 were going to win championships last year. 67,177,and 294 pulled off an amazing victory with the odds favored against them. Galileo definitely deserved to win, but Newton gave them a run for their money in the Semi's and Archimedes gave them a pretty good run for their money in the finals. The only reason I think that Archimedes didn't reach the scores that Galileo did in the finals was because of the 3v2 that was happening.

Last edited by O'Sancheski : 15-05-2011 at 10:20.
Reply With Quote