View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2011, 08:26
Mr. Lim Mr. Lim is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mr. Lim
no team
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,125
Mr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design

If the electrical/pneumatics side of the team was as diligent about CAD, it would be a lot more clear.

There is pressurized air supplied to only one side of that pneumatic cylinder, such that it is constantly pulling downwards. We had that air supply regulated to about 40 PSI, and it perfectly counterbalanced the arm uniformly through its entire length of travel, on both sides of the robot.

Unfortunately, whenever we ran the arm downwards, the air in the cylinder would compress, and the regulator would bleed excess pressure. While this was desired for both safety and uniform counterbalancing reasons, it used up a lot of the air whenever we moved our arm downward.

We ended up replacing the setup with a few loops of surgical tubing.
__________________
In life, what you give, you keep. What you fail to give, you lose forever...
Reply With Quote