View Single Post
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-05-2011, 01:31
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 867
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: IRI (CONTEMPLATED) Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlecMataloni View Post
You're absolutely right. It's wrong to blame the GDC for not being able to see into the future; however, if the game played out like they may have expected (with only slot loading robots), there's a possibility of tube scoring being even less frequent (with lane congestion issues, more defense, etc.) and the minibot race would've been even more over-valued.
The main problem with the tube scoring in this game, IMO, is that ultimately most good alliances were able to fill the top row and most/all of the second row; at that point, additional tubes did not change the score much. I suspect the GDC was thinking it would not be so easy, and thus the differences between alliances would come in filling the top two rows, making for different score differences... of course I'm completely guessing here.
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
Reply With Quote