Thread: Belt vs. Chain
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-05-2011, 12:05
lemiant's Avatar
lemiant lemiant is offline
the Dreamer
AKA: Alex
FRC #4334 (Alberta Tech Alliance)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 562
lemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Belt vs. Chain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
The reasons were right there in the paper:
  • Belt requires a more integrated design and precise manufacturing
  • Wheels and belt must be assembled concurrently, unlike chain
  • Belt requires more physical space because of the width differences for varying load capacities
  • Chain drive is a known, proven system for transfer of power from the drive motors / transmissions to the drive wheels and between the wheels

I doubt 1 & 2 would be insurmountable for a team like 1114 (who I happen to know uses #25 chain), or 228. I'm not sure about #3, how much extra space are we talking here. And #4 has never scared a powerhouse out of doing anything.