View Single Post
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-05-2011, 12:26
Joe G.'s Avatar
Joe G. Joe G. is offline
Taking a few years (mostly) off
AKA: Josepher
no team (Formerly 1687, 5400)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,447
Joe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Joe G.
Re: Why Losers Lose?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperNerd256 View Post
You obviously don't get it. There are no losers in FIRST! I say that anyone who builds a robot out of a kit of parts, in just 6 weeks, to solve a complicated task is definitely a winner!
I don't exactly agree with this statement, but by this definition, there are still teams that loose. I know because I've been there.

Why do some teams loose to this degree? I have some pretty strong views on this issue

Internal Culture: Teams don't achieve because they don't demand it. They don't build the mentality that powerhouse teams have: that to get something, you have to work hard for it. Want to know the rules? You've got to study them. Want a flawless grabber? You've got to put in the hours to prototype it. Want a fantastic sponsor? Hunt them down. If a team doesn't teach these ideas to their students, they tend to get lazy.

I think that this one, more than anything else, is the root of the issue. Everything else just feeds into it.

Denial: I think this is the root cause of some of the "Student built vs. Mentor Built" flames. If a team creates a robot that is not as effective as one of the powerhouses, it is easy to marginalize the achievement of the powerhouse, by suggesting that they didn't follow the spirit of the program. It's hard to put in the hard work required to reach the level of the powerhouses. And a team that's cut corners through the build process is likely to cut corners here as well. If this happens, however, these teams begin to feel that they're the best thing in the world, and have no reason to improve.

Giving up: There's a view out there that powerhouses have everything come easily to them: that their sponsors walked up to them and handed out money, that their robots work on the first try, and that they win events without really trying. When these things don't happen to a team, they get distressed. If they have a hard time securing work space or funding, they panic, rather than work for it. And as far as robots go, many teams schedule their builds assuming everything will go perfectly, and when it doesn't, they fail.

And many other issues mentioned in this thread. But these ones are the biggest that I've seen firsthand.
__________________
FIRST is not about doing what you can with what you know. It is about doing what you thought impossible, with what you were inspired to become.

2007-2010: Student, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2012-2014: Technical Mentor, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2015-2016: Lead Mentor, FRC 5400, Team WARP
2016-???: Volunteer and freelance mentor-for-hire

Last edited by Joe G. : 26-05-2011 at 12:33.
Reply With Quote