[cbale2000]

I think we might be seriously over-thinking this licensing "issue". I can just about guarantee that more than 90% of the editors of FIRSTwiki don't (or didn't) even know there IS a license, let alone care about it changing. I also have yet to see any of the content uploaded to FIRSTwiki put on ANY sort of license. Why? Probably because the people taking the pictures, or making the logos don't care if they're licensed or not.

I don't mean to come off as a bit harsh, but it seems like a big deal is being made about an issue that has never in the history of FIRSTwiki been and, as far as I'm concerned, doesn't need to be, a big deal. I understand why having a license on the site is a good thing, but lets not get stuck lawyering about the topic and forget what the important thing is here - the content.