
26-05-2011, 17:32
|
 |
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
 FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,982
|
|
|
Re: Is powder coating and annodizing worthwhile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11
Some many take this the wrong way or overexaggerate this but: A powder coated robot has an advantage of getting picked over a non-powder coated robot, for me atleast. Depending on the depth of the regional, your third robot may just be playing defense and won't be asked to score much. If the regional is very shallow, you may just want your 3rd partner not to lose you the regional (with red cards this year, this was a factor). So, you essentially want a smart teams that understands the rules and won't get penalties or get in you and your scoring partner's way. If a team took the time and effort to find someone to powder coat and scheduled it, the team is probably more likely to be smart, to read the rules, and think about strategy than an equally good robot but looks messy and sloppely put together. Its a very minor factor in the grand scheme of alliance selection, but there is a practical advantage to powder coated (or just a clean, good looking) robot. (This can also be applied to pit organization, team shirts, team cheers, interaction with team members in the stand...your preformance on the field is not the only thing that matters in getting selected, especially as 3rd robot).
|
Teams that pick partners on superficial criteria, such as paint, are most likely teams that aren't going far in the elims anyways.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "- Tennyson, Ulysses

|