View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-06-2011, 17:04
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,189
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: "Keep it simple, stupid:" design ideas seemingly ignored in FTC

Another factor is that the size of the electronics doesn't scale too elegantly so the robots look more complex, also, the lack of a defined bumper perimeter that marks the edges of the robot adds to this.

Now that I think about it, nothing scales elegantly from FRC to FTC. The metal, sensors, controllers, batteries, motors, and, to a great extent, the gears. An FRC gear train can be incredibly complex, yet completely hidden from view. The gears in FTC are so proportionally huge that the only place to put them is where they are easily visible. and even a 2 stage reduction can seem ridiculously complex while it is a typical sight in FRC.
__________________

Last edited by PAR_WIG1350 : 02-06-2011 at 17:11.
Reply With Quote