View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2011, 00:52
sammyjalex's Avatar
sammyjalex sammyjalex is offline
Registered User
AKA: Sam Alexander
no team
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 66
sammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud ofsammyjalex has much to be proud of
Re: 1 to 1 Computing -- Seeking Input

I suggest that those of you who ask what will be the function of the computers, if they will replace the schools current desktops or offer specs. for high processing machines do a basic search of what is the purpose of 1:1 computing.

Likely, those computers that serve higher-level technical functions will not be effected and these computers will not serve that purpose. Rather, the purpose of 1:1 is equity; the potential for all students to have unlimited access to a computer for which they can take some degree of ownership. This is an ed. tech. initiative all in itself. It is not the schools new computers nor does it in any way directly effect students with divergent computer-based interests. Likely those students will have other opportunities to pursue those interests. As far as I understand, with 1:1, the computer is an aid for ms office applications and the internet (i.e. windows live, mailing lists). As a result, I can't imagine a netbook would not serve these necessary functions. Think that the goal is that all students have access to computer-based group projects and word processing.

Best,
Sam

P.S. I love that we are having an involved discussion of ed. tech. on CD because this is why FIRST is meaningful for me and many people I know. The question is how do we alter the tools we use for learning to make it more accessible and more meaningful. The answer, broadly, is to decrease win-lose scenarios and increase those that are win-win through collaborative strategies using tech. With this in mind, FIRST is an answer, through all of its faculties, but it is limited. I do not believe that FIRST is plausible for implementation in the average classroom. 1:1, cloud platforms and smart technologies are others and they can be applied to the classroom, but, of course, effort needs to be a applied to create effective strategies and lessons for students using these tools. They are only tools, just as the robot is only a tool and each team creative applies what that means for its program.

FIRST, for me, is about mental wrestling with oneself through the ideas of others and learning through this dialogue. Thank you Sal, CD, and FRC 47.
__________________
New York City FIRST
nycfirst.org

Last edited by sammyjalex : 16-06-2011 at 01:09.
Reply With Quote