Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH
Seeing as I can't edit my previous post:
469 was the most reliable (and feared) tunnel-blocking diverter in 2010.
@Duke: I don't count the many slope-side diverters in the same category as the dedicated diverters like 469, 51, and 125. There's a pretty big difference between having a sloped side to simply bounce the balls in the general direction you want them to go and being able to put the ball in the goal using a diversion channel. Could they divert? Yes. Could they score and divert at the same time? They did need luck on their side.
|
I agree, thats why i suggested a clearer way of putting it. I knew what you meant when referencing 469. However, lavery brought up 2992 and i had never seen their bot before, and not one of the pics from Nationals was from the front side so i couldnt really tell if they could score or not. Sorry for the confusion.
