View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-06-2011, 01:24
Hawiian Cadder's Avatar
Hawiian Cadder Hawiian Cadder is offline
Registered User
AKA: Isaak
FRC #0159 (Alpine Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Fort Colins Colorado
Posts: 573
Hawiian Cadder is a name known to allHawiian Cadder is a name known to allHawiian Cadder is a name known to allHawiian Cadder is a name known to allHawiian Cadder is a name known to allHawiian Cadder is a name known to all
Re: pic: West coast drive design

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
He's got a valid point, it just took him a few posts to get around to it.

Yes, we avoid 1/16" wall on our rails for drive that have bearing blocks, etc...

We're pretty sure it'd work, but for a base that's already around 30 lbs with motors, we take the few extra pounds that just two rails of 1/8" represent.
I was never suggesting making the cross-members 1/8, but 1/16 tends to bend around where you attach other stuff to it that will experience a lot of force. My fault, I should be more clear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Can we not make claims about robot strength or material thickness based purely on guesswork please? Seriously, if you have no experience with the material, there's no shame in just not posting.
If I don't have experience with what is being discussed in a thread I don't post anything. We used 1/16 and 1/8 tube this year on various parts of our robot, and the 1/8 turned out to be overkill on the members that did not have axles or the tower bolted on. In the members with axles or the tower bolts, we should have used more washers to prevent the tubes bending. The 1/16 was about perfect where we used it.

Last edited by Hawiian Cadder : 29-06-2011 at 02:13.
Reply With Quote