Thread: M30?
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-08-2011, 14:24
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,597
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: M30?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
For the record, asking " whether we should care about the rules for offseason purposes" will always get you a sarcastic response. Either you always care about the rules or you shouldn't be competing. Of course, with definitions as arbitrary as "light switch" I can't blame you for trying...
I tentatively disagree with you on this topic. For example: the Kinect was explicitly illegal, but I still think it is an awesome off-season project. Even if it is still illegal next season, the students will gain some seriously cool experience.

This thread's particular potential rule violation is a little less vague, but it could still potentially have some validity. If it was a pure matter of availability and everyone involved knew the reason and the effects of the deviation, I believe it could be acceptable. If it was a matter of M30 being superior to PC, perhaps not.