Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
It's not so much what is essential/non-essential, it's more about how much detail is needed; it's the same feature either way (the tooth profile). The gear tooth profile is not just a simple arc, it's a changing curve. You can approximate it as less curves and still get reasonable accuracy (which you'll notice a lot of people/companies have done on their CAD models). I also imagine different machines might not get "confused" by the new curve.
If you google some about how to draw spur gears, you'll see what I mean and it will make total sense.
I can't make the blanket statement about water versus laser, just that the run of lasered parts we did this year that were .125 thick had a much cleaner and smoother edge than this run of waterjetted parts. I did tell the waterjetter to cut everything very fast though (to test if we get the same functionality out of less sponsor time), not sure how valid of a comparison that is. There are an awful lot of machines on the market as well, combined with the fact that machine settings can also have a huge effect on finish.
|
So I got a chance to check out gear tooth profiles in my work's copy of the Machinery's Handbook. DEFINITELY understand what you mean now about the curvature of the tooth haha.
To propagate the curve, how many points should I use if using a laser, or should I just use whatever the gear generator in SW does?
Thanks again!