Thread: Swerve Gear Box
View Single Post
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-08-2011, 22:03
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,064
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Swerve Gear Box

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
We made one and got it running in both configurations. I don't see how my statement about the length of the code we wrote for our "unicorn" crab is simpler than the code for our "2+2" (drive and steer pairs) crab is speculation...

My statement wasn't meant to be a personal attack, I just think it's invalid to say I prefer x to y when you've only done x. This isn't quite a black and white area though.
I was saying that it was speculation that other people's statements were speculation. I can assure that every single statement I have posted is based on my experience or on various studies I have read for my classes or for my job. If you think someone's statement is wrong you should probably ask them for clarification rather than making broad comments that call into question every other post in the thread.

I actually completely agree that Unicorn is simpler than 2+2 to program (I'm not as qualified to comment on building them outside of vex/lego scale so I will defer to those who have experience there).

Edit: I do hate the phrase "speculation that it is speculation" sounds almost xzibit-ish.
__________________




.