Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawiian Cadder
This white paper does a good job of quantifying the bending problems on a standard 2010 robot. the frame bent enough to throw #35 (i think) chain, so belts would be out of the question.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2398 |
Yes, it was #35 chain thrown off that chassis, but be careful not to take this one data point as a universal problem with the kit chassis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
The 2010 frame was substantially different than the 2011 frame, since the axle mounts were stood off several inches (6? 8? more?) from the actual chassis. The issue that really caused the bending and flex wasn't the kitbot profile as much as the modules that wheels were mounted to. The parts flexed relative to one another and your end result is thrown chain.
|
As Chris points out this is an issue of structure. In the case of the 2010 kitobt it is a lack of triangles supporting the chain path and the open section of the wheel risers that cause the problem.
The kit frame should only be one portion of your entire robot's structure. Step back and look at the whole robot. Use the other systems to reinforce the chassis and use the chassis to reinforce the other systems.
I used #25 chain on a kit frame this year with no issues.