Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Ross
I wonder why FIRST didn't publicize this?
|
Best I can tell from rooting through their site, this particular challenge is their championship round and is thus invite-only.
The challenge has seven quality metrics they're trying to minimize (with each metric carrying its own definable weight):
-Difference in average team age on each alliance between the two alliances
-Difference in average rank of a team (defined from 1 to 10 in the challenge, where 1 is rookie and 10 is reigning champion) between the two alliances
-Unique partners
-Unique opponents
-Time between matches (more is better)
-Assignment to red or blue
-Position in player station
If FIRST took the current match assignment criteria (as defined in
The Tournament--PDF link) and put the age and (reasonably-calculated) rank criteria in beneath the unique opponent/partner criteria, then it could reduce the number of "oh-crap-we-play-against-Beatty-AND-Simbots-this-match?!" rounds--at that point, the algorithm is likely to switch one of them to your alliance (especially at Championship, where they'd have the benefit of regular-season data).
TLDR: This could evolve into a good thing or a bad thing, depending on what weight you put on the factors.