View Single Post
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2011, 12:59
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,126
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Match Scheduling Algorithm Competition

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
for modern computers, there just aren't all that many ways to combine 16 to 128 teams, in 4 or 6 team matches.
128N6 = 5,423,611,200

6N3/2 = 10

128N6*6N3/2 = 54,236,112,000 (possible matches)

So for a 40-match tournament,

54,236,112,000N40 = 2.88x10381 (possible different "tournaments", not counting the order that mathces are played)*

*Of course, the vast majority of these "tournaments" are patently ridiculous - like one team playing all 40 matches and another not playing at all. With just a bit of smarts, the number could be reduced greatly. And, unless you are designing an algorithm to examine all possible tournaments and pick the "best" one, you don't have to deal with this search space


Last edited by Ether : 03-10-2011 at 13:46.
Reply With Quote