View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-10-2011, 09:29
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Custom Solenoid Breakout

Based on the rules from 2011 (as Al said), my interpretation is illegal.

However,

http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...ical-resources has a file called "Solenoid package" (a zip) which contains a PDF schematic. In it, you find that the solenoid bumper does just take the outputs and route them to headers.

Since it is done this way, I think it would be reasonable to allow replacement of this breakout by teams. I also think that it would be reasonable to allow direct wiring to a DB25, as a team could then build a multipin cable connecting the solenoid outputs to a valve manifold.

The way it is now (direct wiring outputs to solenoids), there isn't any real reason to restrict directly wiring to the solenoid module.

But that is my opinion.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack