View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-10-2011, 13:42
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Drive train idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Sometimes there is a reason you haven't seen something done.

Consider looking to 2008, several interesting drive systems came out of teams that year. Of particular interest to you might be 65's ackerman and the 'twitch' drive system. (CDM search the tag 'twitch' and you should find it)

Part of my objection to a system such as you described would be complexity of code for little benefit. When mecanum wheels are fixed you already have 3 controllable degrees of freedom. Their behavior is very well known (thanks, in no small part, to Ether). The issue is that once you start rotating the wheels you add significant complexity into the calculations while not adding any real value (You don't gain additional DoF and, it could be argued, you actually lose capability due to additional weight and use of an additional motor).

Twitch came from team 1565 in 2008. It was called the linkage drive, and it was a 4 omni-wheeled robot, and the linkage would switch the wheels from pointing N/S to E/W. Switching at speed resulted in significant coasting in the direction of initial travel, creating arced movements around the racetrack.

Look for pictures from Waterloo or Greater Toronto to see it. 1565 is currently defunct, having not competed in the 2011 season.
Reply With Quote