Thread: Physics Quiz 3
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-11-2011, 14:13
Ninja_Bait's Avatar
Ninja_Bait Ninja_Bait is offline
Former Prez of Making Things Go
AKA: Jake Potter
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 650
Ninja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Physics Quiz 3

I wanted to think about this kind of extension after I figured out part one, but I had to learn how to drive instead.

I'm going to go very slowly... and try to not be too confused...

1. Centripetal acceleration is constant so:
Centripetal force on the wheel = (WL/g)(omega_p)^2 = Tension in the rod - Friction parallel to the rod

2. Tangential acceleration is zero, so net force perpendicular to the rod is zero.

3. And I think brndn was right in saying F=(mu_k)(W), yes?

4. And then friction parallel plus friction perpendicular would still equal tau_k/(rsintheta) if there was no wheel slip. However, there is wheel slip, which is why point 2 is true.

So, the only forces are tension and friction parallel, so friction is anti-parallel to the rod. At least I think so...?

Is there another way to get the magnitude of friction using the difference in wheel speed and rod speed?
__________________
You can't fix something that isn't broken... but you can always break things that aren't fixed!


Last edited by Ninja_Bait : 19-11-2011 at 14:45.