View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-12-2011, 20:00
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,814
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wheel Axle Material

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
A shaft that yielded is just as useless as a shaft that broke.
Not necessarily true. A bent dead-axle could still function and drive. A bent live cantilevered axle might throw a chain, but will still rotate. One might also get penalized if a part of the robot broke off and was left on the field.

Some yielding, especially localized yielding, does not render a part as failed. It was a hard mindset to get into after I got out of college. I now always think through "what if this part yields a little bit right here?" and evaluate if it will still function afterwards.

On the subject of failure, a steel shaft will deflect much less at yield than a similarly sized aluminum shaft despite having a lower yield strength. And either material will recover its shape after bending. In my experience forming both materials, I found that alloy steel will recover it's shape (spring back) more than aluminum will.

Sure you can argue it either way, I'm just offering my point of view and my experience.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.