Thread: WCD vs. Swerve
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2011, 17:48
Ninja_Bait's Avatar
Ninja_Bait Ninja_Bait is offline
Former Prez of Making Things Go
AKA: Jake Potter
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 650
Ninja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond reputeNinja_Bait has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WCD vs. Swerve

Wow, sounds like everyone's prototyping a WCD and a swerve this year. Thought we were the only ones! Anyway, we too ended up only building the WCD. It's way simpler, cheaper, and easier to build. Even if we had built the swerve drive, we'd have never used it this year because of the complex programming and likely engineering issues that would have cropped up. We may use the WCD, though.

Also remember that good drivers trump good robots. Not only is it easier to drive a WCD, but the shortened build schedule affords you more practice time.

Swerve drive IS awesome, but only if you've perfected it. It sucks when it doesn't work or doesn't drive or doesn't fit in budget.
__________________
You can't fix something that isn't broken... but you can always break things that aren't fixed!

Reply With Quote