Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526
These points aren't necessarily 100% accurate. Both of these will vary with the implementation of the swerve and the drive it's being compared to.
Pushing power is defined by the robots over all weight and wheel configuration, being a swerve doesn't really change much here - other than the fact that a 'unicorn swerve' has the issue of losing pushing power if one or more of the wheels lose the ground as the motor's power is wasted and the weight on the driven wheels will now be less - this is an issue that any drive with independent wheels can encounter.
For examples of fast swerves other than 973's Emperor Swerve, reference either 16 (In any year, but 2008 or 2011 would be best) or 148 (2008).
|
In addition to this- you (leland) keep saying "your standard swerve drive" but what are you defining that as?
The pushing thing can be whatever depending on the drive gearbox just as any other drivetrain can be. 2 speed solves all problems you mentioned.