Quote:
Originally Posted by davidthefat
Complexity of the hardware.
|
Ignoring the original posters statement?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MICHAELABICK
Simply, there is none. An independent coaxial swerve, programmed perfectly, will be the best drive out there. The one performance disadvantage, is that if one module brakes, your whole drive system is down
|
Oh really? lost a drive chain on an 8motor swerve to one of the modules recently and kept on driving just fine, barely noticed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigboez
I'd say one big disadvantage is that it isn't very practical to implement a two speed drivetrain with swerve. You'd need to pick one multi purpose speed and gear for that, making your robot prone to being pushed around by a 2-speed 6WD bot.
|
One of the largest Pro's to swerve is almost never having to get into pushing contest you don't want to, in many cases rendering 2 speeds not necessary. (keep in mind i had a 2 speed swerve in 08, using COTS AM gen2's....so the 2 speed part really didn't require much work on my end)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexH
They eat a larger chunk of the weight budget than a normal tank drive.
Only effective if you have a good driver who can capitalize on the directional freedom that a swerve offers.
|
I've got a few concepts that could hit < 35lbs for complete chassis with completely independent module power and steering, so weights only really an issue if you aren't trying hard enough
Please only post things when you KNOW them, preferably from experience, or as some have done, put a proper disclaimer