Thread: Lighter Robots
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2012, 23:49
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is online now
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,022
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lighter Robots

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAPSMMR2410 View Post
Its more of, that we need a lighter frame so we can have (as in logomotion) a better arm that could work better. It would have needed a better claw which would have added more weight.
We work on figuring out a light weight design for the "upper" stuff, and don't worry so much about the bottom of the robot. Once you come up with a basic design of how to make the manipulator stuff work, then spend a few more days thinking of ways to make it much lighter, using different materials, design ideas, etc. Our logomotion robot had a very light weight structure holding the arm, and the arm and claw weighed very little, and were made mostly with materials from the local building supply places like Home Depot and Lowes.

Lightweight stuff includes using thinwall square aluminum tubing and ABS sewer pipe, 1/4" plywood, thin Lexan sheet, thin aluminum sheet, etc. Figure out how to put things together with lightweight fastening methods, such as rivets.
Reply With Quote