View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2012, 17:02
DavidGitz's Avatar
DavidGitz DavidGitz is offline
Lead Technical Advisor
FRC #1208 (MeTool Brigade)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: O'Fallon, IL
Posts: 341
DavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to DavidGitz Send a message via MSN to DavidGitz Send a message via Yahoo to DavidGitz
Re: RobotOpen Control Shield for Arduino

This is a great idea. I would like to see more on specs, documentation, cost, etc (available on your website? It's blocked at my work, sorry).

I'm sure that most teams normally try to re-use an IFI system for maintaining the usage of their robots, if they have them. We have done this, and although we have many IFI boards there are certain disadvantages that this product would win against.

My only criticism is calling this product a "Drop-In" replacement. While the hardware I/O mimics the basic connectivity (to an extent) it is most certainly not a drop-in replacement. Besides the obvious that all software would have to be re-written (Dashboard/Driver Station/Robot) this board also lacks (I assume) vision processing abilities, multiple quadrature encoders, etc etc. I'm not putting this product down at all, but I would call it something more sensible like a cRIO-alternative or something along these lines. When you call it a drop-in replacement, I think some newer people would automatically assume this device is capable of performing the same functionality as the cRIO, which it is not.
__________________
Reply With Quote