One thing i would like to point out... Since the contact would be on purpose, it would result in a technical foul thus 9 points.
Also, the way I see it, it all comes down to whether an exception to a rule is a part of said rule. And in my opinion, in this case, it is. since [G28]'s exception is categorized within [G44], exploiting [G28] would be exploiting [G44].([G28] being an exception to [G44] is within [G44] itself, thus [G28] is linked with [G44] and thus being linked to [G45] ... thus a technical foul and red-card would be given for exploiting [G44]. Just because your exploiting a specific part of [G44] does not mean you aren't exploiting the whole rule.)
So only in the case of exploiting [G28] and/or [G44] can you be issued a red card. In all other cases [G44] negates the penalty, such exploiting any rule other than [G44] and [G28], no [G45] penalty get issued. [G45] gets issued if [G28] gets exploited, or the fact that point negation gets exploited(I.E. stealing more than three balls from an offensive robot.(Of course this requires the offensive robot falling into some pre-existing trap of them giving you their balls.))
But of course it does all come down to the GDC's decision. My team and I were debating about this After Kick-off.
