View Single Post
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2012, 22:45
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,011
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ball Trajectory Planning

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikegrundvig View Post
To that end, we need to know quite a few things starting with the ball diameter, density, and mass (does someone have the weight of the ball measured accurately?).

because determining the coefficient of friction for a pebbled surface seems exceptionally difficult.

Another potential nasty problem is the Magnus Effect.
Diameter is 25"/Pi
Weight is 302 grams +/- about 2% (based on an unreasonable sample size of 3)
Density can be calculated, and is not necessarily uniform.

Also consider that the surface WILL change as the ball gets used in a tournament.

The Magnus effect is NOT trivial nor can it be ignored, if your launcher imparts spin greater than about 2 or 3 spins per second. That spin also has a significant effect upon how the ball will bounce after it hits the backboard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikegrundvig View Post
no need to over-complicate it.
Right. Use the match for a first order estimate, and go empirical from there.

BUT, understanding all those variables will come in handy when you try to solve any problems with variability of your trajectory.
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
Reply With Quote