View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2012, 00:30
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,138
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Major Issue in Team Update #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacepenguine View Post
And as for issue 3, if a robot's not on the bridge, why should it count. This allows for end-game defense.
It doesn't allow for defense though. The offending robot (the red robot in my example) gets a technical-foul and a red card. It's still very illegal, it just robs the blue team of bridge points. When the original version of the rules came out, before being fully supported was a requirement for balancing, the penalty for [G25] gave the offending team a technical-foul, a red card and consolation bridge points for the alliance that was interfered with, which I believe is the intent.

The new rules introduce an ambiguity where defense is still a very severe penalty (disqualification), but the alliance that was interfered with may not receive their bridge points due to the interference.
__________________