View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2012, 12:25
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,750
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Major Issue in Team Update #1

[G25] overrides the definition of balanced that is now provided. It says that if touching the bridge interfered with balancing, the bridge will be counted as balanced, no matter if it actually is balanced or not.

I agree that putting the definition of balanced into the rules in two different places is redundant, but I don't think it makes it unclear as to how the points will be awarded. It's 10, 20 or 40 for the act of balancing, depending on how many robots are balanced.
__________________
(since 2004)