Thread: Ball Trajectory Planning
View Single Post
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2012, 15:58
lcoreyl's Avatar
lcoreyl lcoreyl is offline
WittyTitleGen can't link to library
AKA: Milner
no team
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 201
lcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud of
Re: Ball Trajectory Planning
Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier View Post
It depends on what your goals are to determine which is more important.
You don't have to choose between precision and accuracy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier View Post
A very precise robot is easier to defend, and more suseptable to problems.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean

Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier View Post
from the open court, putting it in a vicinity may be better than being precise.
I'm assuming you mean a shooter that has GOOD accuracy and BAD precision MIGHT make it, where one with BAD accuracy and GOOD precision, WON’T make it. I agree, but I’m not encouraging the latter robot be built.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier View Post
Shooting for THE hoops as opposed to A hoop is not necessarily a bad strategy.
That’s completely fine if this is your strategy, but why worry about drag/magnus? Say your software automatically compensates your expected landing spot by 2 feet; however, mechanically your margin of error is 10 feet. What’s the point there?
Reply With Quote