View Single Post
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2012, 22:42
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,137
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: What is your cooperition bridge plan?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
So in a match where one of the robots on my side dies, and the match is very close, you would blacklist me if I said "no thanks" and instead balanced on my own alliance bridge?

Just curious. Because I'd rather go for the win than just give the Thunderchickens QP.
I can't speak for Paul, but I believe he's talking about pre-match strategy. Before the match, there is no reason not to go for the coopertition bridge unless you don't have 3 robots that are physically capable of getting on a ramp. His other case would be an alliance has 3 functional, able robots and purposely decides during the match not to go for the coopertition bridge. In both cases, the only purpose that it serves is for the opposing alliance to take a QP hit in order to deny the Thunderchickens QP.

The situation you are describing is the same as I mentioned, where you have a choice between going for a win or going for a loss with coopertition, due to a dead or otherwise incapable alliance partner(s). I hope that Paul would not blacklist a team that makes such a decision.
__________________