View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2012, 03:57
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Van Door Motor Disassembly

Take this one to the Q&A. The 2012 rules aren't clear about what's integral and what's not. Furthermore, since you can bring in scrap motors never before seen, FIRST can't decide in advance whether such a modification is legal for a particular design.

Ask FIRST to make a blanket statement about what's modifiable (under the cited rule) and what's integral (per the cited blue box), to aid in the selection of motors. They just need to officially say something like "inspectors will operate with a strong presumption that motor gearbox modifications are permissible, unless they have strong evidence that the motor itself has been electrically or mechanically compromised".

But until that time, it's hard to answer with any certainty. The worm gear systems have been variously considered integral and non-integral.
Reply With Quote