View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2012, 22:22
farmersvilleRob's Avatar
farmersvilleRob farmersvilleRob is offline
Registered User
FRC #4084
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Farmersville
Posts: 172
farmersvilleRob is infamous around these parts
Re: Side vs. Top Shooter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex.q View Post
Do I read this as I should use my cims for a shooter, or can multiple FPs or RS-775-18s provide the necessary torque? We don't yet have a finished prototype of this system, but our goal is 20 ft (hopefully). We do not however, wish to lose our cims from the drivetrain unless absolutely necessary. And in regards to copying 2006/09 I don't mind copying it if* it works.

*conditionally of course.
Well, it's very difficult to do the math on motors without the stress, without the launch parameters (angle, number of motors and wheels), and rpm relative to a urethane foam basketball lol but I would say definitely more torque than any 2006 or 2009 bot. And based on prototypes, I would say test both. The 775 Banebot probably when geared down to the appropriate torque doesn't display enough rpms. At 20 feet and 45 degree launch angle you need ~30.008 feet/sec of muzzle velocity. Based on our excel spreadsheet of glorious math!

ps. That takes into account for distance and hoop height from launch (in our spreadsheet its set to 6 feet) and ball weight
Reply With Quote