View Single Post
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 13:41
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,696
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 3 robots designs I hope to see this season

Assuming a 60 degree arc length of contact on a 8" 1-wheel shooter at ~2400 RPM, the ball needs a minimum of 500 watts transferred to it after inefficiencies in order to go 54 feet (~42 ft/s for middle goal). This is doable with a heavy flywheel that has plenty of spin-up time and 4 Banebots RS-550 motors connected to the same wheel. At 63% overall efficiency, that's ~67 amps of current while a ball is in the shooter. If you sit in one spot, that's chump change.

The kinematic equations are your friends this year.
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2 * a * d
You have D, Vf, and Vi. You can find a, which then can give you required force via F = m * a, and then a torque via Tau = Force * radius of the wheel. Then you can multiply Torque (N*m) * Wheel speed (rotations / second) and you get power required.

Of course, that assumes a perfect flywheel effect and a perfect contact patch between ball and wheel, so YMMV. Prototype it.

It also assumes that a 84" tall robot will never block the shot, heh. We aren't even attempting it because the trajectory length is so long that a variance of ~0.7 degrees in the shooter causes the shot to miss. That's not worth putting 4 motors on the shooter.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 16-01-2012 at 13:45.
Reply With Quote